A former beauty salon owner is speaking out after a federal judge rejected a lawsuit she filed in May alleging the industry discriminates against black and brown people.

    Sara Dye, a Black Lives Matter activist, claimed that the salon she owned in Los Angeles, Black Laundry, failed to treat customers who had been arrested or victims of crime.

    “It’s not an excuse, it’s a fact,” Dye said in a statement.

    “There is an actual and significant racial discrimination that occurs in the industry.”

    In a ruling issued Thursday, U.S. District Judge Loretta Preska said the plaintiffs were not alleging intentional discrimination, and that she was not ruling on whether the defendants were negligent.

    She said the case had no merit, and it would be “difficult to find a single, unobjectionable, substantive basis” for plaintiffs’ claims.

    Dye and other plaintiffs in the lawsuit allege that the Black Lydies have failed to properly treat clients accused of crimes, and have charged them exorbitant fees if they don’t pay.

    In 2015, Dye sued the Los Angeles-based Black Liddes, alleging the company failed to adequately educate its staff on how to properly handle the treatment of black and other minorities, and failed to provide employees with proper training.

    The company denied any wrongdoing and said Dye had made allegations that it had not done.

    An initial complaint filed in March 2015 alleged that Black Leddys treatment of customers was “inhumane, discriminatory, and in direct violation of the U.D.A. Equal Employment Opportunity Act.”

    The complaint also alleged that the Lydys were violating the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and the Fair Housing Act of 1968.

    In a motion for dismissal Thursday, Preska rejected the plaintiffs’ allegations and said the lawsuit had not been proved beyond a reasonable doubt.

    The ruling said the suit was not meritless because it alleged “a pattern or practice of discriminatory treatment by the defendant,” and that Dye’s claims had not established a “factual basis” to prove that her complaints were true.

    Preska said in the ruling that Dies claims were not substantiated by other plaintiffs and that her case was not a test of whether the company has been negligent in its treatment of its employees.

    While the Laundys have not yet filed any response to the ruling, Dyrd’s attorney, Michael A. Tompkins, said his client plans to appeal the ruling.

    This case is going to go to trial, but we have no idea how long it will take, he said in an email to The Associated Press.

    “This is going right to the Supreme Court.”

    RELATED ARTICLES

    후원 콘텐츠

    한국 NO.1 온라인카지노 사이트 추천 - 최고카지노.바카라사이트,카지노사이트,우리카지노,메리트카지노,샌즈카지노,솔레어카지노,파라오카지노,예스카지노,코인카지노,007카지노,퍼스트카지노,더나인카지노,바마카지노,포유카지노 및 에비앙카지노은 최고카지노 에서 권장합니다.카지노사이트 추천 | 바카라사이트 순위 【우리카지노】 - 보너스룸 카지노.년국내 최고 카지노사이트,공식인증업체,먹튀검증,우리카지노,카지노사이트,바카라사이트,메리트카지노,더킹카지노,샌즈카지노,코인카지노,퍼스트카지노 등 007카지노 - 보너스룸 카지노.카지노사이트 - NO.1 바카라 사이트 - [ 신규가입쿠폰 ] - 라이더카지노.우리카지노에서 안전 카지노사이트를 추천드립니다. 최고의 서비스와 함께 안전한 환경에서 게임을 즐기세요.메리트 카지노 더킹카지노 샌즈카지노 예스 카지노 코인카지노 퍼스트카지노 007카지노 파라오카지노등 온라인카지노의 부동의1위 우리계열카지노를 추천해드립니다.【우리카지노】바카라사이트 100% 검증 카지노사이트 - 승리카지노.【우리카지노】카지노사이트 추천 순위 사이트만 야심차게 모아 놓았습니다. 2021년 가장 인기있는 카지노사이트, 바카라 사이트, 룰렛, 슬롯, 블랙잭 등을 세심하게 검토하여 100% 검증된 안전한 온라인 카지노 사이트를 추천 해드리고 있습니다.우리카지노 | 카지노사이트 | 더킹카지노 - 【신규가입쿠폰】.우리카지노는 국내 카지노 사이트 브랜드이다. 우리 카지노는 15년의 전통을 가지고 있으며, 메리트 카지노, 더킹카지노, 샌즈 카지노, 코인 카지노, 파라오카지노, 007 카지노, 퍼스트 카지노, 코인카지노가 온라인 카지노로 운영되고 있습니다.